![]() Democrat-leaning pundits have been unnervingly quick to use phrases like “Russia hacked the election.” John McCain and Lindsey Graham noted the “small price” Russia paid for its “brazen attack.” The Democratic National Committee, meanwhile, said Thursday that taken alone, the Obama response is “ insufficient” as a response to “attacks on the United States by a foreign power.”Īdding to the problem is that in the last months of the campaign, and also in the time since the election, we’ve seen an epidemic of factually loose, clearly politically motivated reporting about Russia. Voices in both parties are saying this now. presidential election and deliver the White House to Trump, then expelling a few dozen diplomats after the election seems like an oddly weak and ill-timed response. ![]() If the American security agencies had smoking-gun evidence that the Russians had an organized campaign to derail the U.S. The problem with this story is that, like the Iraq-WMD mess, it takes place in the middle of a highly politicized environment during which the motives of all the relevant actors are suspect. “These data theft and disclosure activities could only have been directed by the highest levels of the Russian government,” he wrote. President Obama issued a terse statement seeming to blame Russia for the hack of the Democratic National Committee emails. Thirty-five Russian nationals will be expelled from the country. In an extraordinary development Thursday, the Obama administration announced a series of sanctions against Russia. The Rolling Stone comments Something About This Russia Story Stinks ![]() Yet, once again the American press is again asked to co-sign a dubious intelligence assessment. Is there any evidence those expelled are “intelligence operatives”? Any hard evidence Russia was behind the Hillary hacks? Any credible evidence that Putin himself is to blame? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |